Monday, November 25, 2013

How To Be Polite: 9 Steps

According to WikiHow (2013), there are simple steps to follow in order to be polite

1. Be Gentle
2. When in doubt, observe others 
3. Be nice
4. Start a conversation by asking questions about the other person 
5. Shake hands 
6. Know the proper dinner etiquette 
7. Have a laugh which shows you are having fun, without being loud 
8. Be graceful and show elegance 
9. Be aware that etiquette and manners vary depending on the cultural region you are in

However, (im)politeness is more complicated because it based on social norms that vary depending on the company, environment, and location. These factors can dictate what is polite.

IMpoliteness is defined by the Merriam-Webster Dictionary (2013) as
  • A discourteous manner that ignores accepted social usage.
  • Not having or showing good manners; RUDE
Whereas politeness is defined as
Stock Photo #255-7542, Young man opening the door of a car for a teenage girl
Politeness
- Best expressed as the practical application of good manners
 or etiquette. It is a culturally defined phenomenon, and therefore
 what is considered polite in one culture can sometimes be quite  rude or simply eccentric in another cultural context.

In American society, politeness can be identified with
- The use of PLEASE and THANK YOU
-Addressing elders with respect and a title.
-Nonverbal gestures including shaking hands 
 and opening doors as seen in the figure Politeness

However, (im)politeness is not only about acting kind, but about saving face which is shown in Brown and Levinson's face theory. Brown & Levinson published their theories in 1987 called Politeness. They believe that "an individuals self-esteem motivates strategies of politeness" (Stanford University 2011, pg. 1).

An individuals self-esteem can be described as face.

Positive face: the positive consistent self-image or 'personality' (crucially including the desire that this self image be appreciated and approved of) claims by interactants.

Negative face: the basic claim to territories, personal preserves, rights to non distraction. In other words, get out of my BUBBLE.

Brown and Levinson had insight when assessing politeness, but the problem with their original theory is that it only dealt with kindness.

RED FLAG:
  • B & L face theory only focuses on individualistic society.
  • They never introduced the theory that people are intentionally impolite.
  • "Underplay the influence of other factors, especially the presence of third parties, which we know to have much more profound effects on verbal interactions" (Stanford 2011, pg. 3).
Going beyond FACE theory:
  • prescriptive social norm- "the rules of behavior enforced by social sanctions"
  • descriptive social norm- based on individuals' experience

Social norms can exist on a smaller, more local scale among communities within a greater social context. Brown and Levinson rely merely on face and fail to examine politeness within a collectivistic group. Also, broader social norms from a dominant culture may be imposed upon less dominant cultures that do not adopt these standards.

To clarify:
Individualistic cultures are characterized as valuing individual needs and goals and include the U.S., Australia, Great Britain, Canada, the Netherlands, New Zealand, and Italy.

Collectivistic cultures stress the importance of cohesion within social groups, and in some cases, the priority of group goals over individual goals. It often focus on community, society, nation or country. Pakistan, India and Japan are all considered to have collectivistic cultures.

It is important to understand that a collectivistic culture can exist within an individualistic nation. This specifically relates to the African American community within the United States. 

They have their own language referred to as ebonics or the AASC that is often misinterpreted as being impolite or rude because it is not understood by others outside of the community.

Our class interviewed African American women using first order impoliteness, or folk interpretation. This relies on the experience of the African American women to educate us about what it is like being immersed in the community. It gives first hand knowledge of what African Americans find polite and impolite in their culture. However, this method is largely overlooked, therefore second order impoliteness is used more often. Second order impoliteness is based on scholars interpretations. Using second order impoliteness hinders ones understanding of impoliteness across cultural variations because it does not  delve into the culture, but rather observe it from the outside. 


Assessing Rachel Jentel

From Rachel Jeantel's testimony, society has labeled her at first glance as dumb, impolite, and rude. However, this one portrayal of Rachel Jeantel does not reveal who she is. Many do not know that Rachel speaks three different languages, English not being her first yet, they proceed to criticize her. Rachel also speaks ebonics which is misinterpreted as being uneducated as emphasized in the picture below. Society has proven to be over judgmental of a girl they know nothing about and do not understand. Not all people view Rachel Jeantel negatively, but to overcome first impressions takes critical thinking and overcoming stereotypes.

To further examine different opinions of Rachel Jeantel, we have conducted interviews with three African American women. We asked them to watch the clip above and then recorded their responses to how they thought Rachel acted in court. The fact that we interviewed African Americans is critical to our examination of  impoliteness among different cultures. These women can relate to Rachel and can say first hand if her behavior is considered rude among her peers or just to the outsider.

This is a summary of our inquiry.

When assessing Rachel's behavior the interviewees interpreted that she was frustrated. They rationalized and attributed this to the possibility of not being prepped before trial or not being informed of the length of time it required. They all understood that she was in a very stressful situation and believed her behavior was in some ways justifiable.

However, they could also see that from different perspectives, Rachel's behavior could have come off negatively. One interviewee, Yevonne Smith, pointed out that the justice department may have seen her attitude as being negative because she should have prioritized the case. The age of the viewer may also affect their view point because elders have more experience  in life and, therefore, can see the importance surrounding the case. On the other hand, young people are different and tend to be more selfish, only thinking about how things affect them.

Ashley Jenkins, another interviewee, identified that the way Rachel was acting could come off as bad character, but also believed people were prejudging her. Ashley noticed that Rachel was impatient, answering with short snappy replies, reflecting a poor attitude. She also commented on the deliberate manipulation of Rachel's use of ebonics in a previous statement to make her appear uneducated. This portrayal skews the publics view of Rachel and causes them to judge her based on the way she speaks instead of what she is saying.

The interviewees agreed that in some ways Rachel's behavior was negative, but also admitted that under the same conditions they would not know how they would have acted. The overall message that came out of discussing Rachel Jeantel's testimony is to not judge people too quickly.

These women defend Rachel's behavior because she is one of them. They are apart of the same community and it could be any black women up their being scrutinized. Rhonda Smith shared that she learned as an African American women that she would be treated differently. All African Americans face the challenge of overcoming stereotypes so these women stand as a united front with a similar background of being discriminated against past and presently.



"Black is Being the Last Person to hear your friend before he is killed and then treated in court like a criminal" 

The focus of everyone's attention was about her appearance, skin color and attitude. And due to her skin color the lawyer treated her like a middle schooler, which I think was extremely disrespectful. The lawyer picked on her weakness and made her less of a key person. He didn't want the jury to make their decision based on her evidence, so he used the race card. Making her look dumb and not trustable, and also attacking her like she was the criminal. He wasn't considerate at all, considering what she is going through. Losing a friend and also being attacked on national television.





References

Jenkins, A. (2013). Graduates View's on Rachel Jeantel. WRA Class Interview. Michigan State University, East Lansing, Mi.

Merriam-Webster. (2013). Impolite-Definition. Retrieved from www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary.

Merriam-Webster. (2013). Polite-Definition. Retrieved from www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary.

Politeness. (2013). Young Man Opening the Door of a Car For a Teenage Girl. [Photograph]. Retrieved from www.superstock.com

Smith, R. (2013). African American Professor's Views on Rachel Jeantel. WRA Class Interview. Michigan State University, East Lansing, Mi.

Smith, Y. (2013). Views on Rachel Jeantel. WRA Class Interview. Michigan State University, East Lansing, Mi.

Stanford University. (2011). Politeness (Brown and Levinson 1987). Retrieved from
www.stanford.edu/Brown_Levinson_1987_Politeness_notes

WESH 2 News. (2013)."Trayvon Martin's Friend Testifying; I'm Leaving Today." [Youtube]. Retrieved from www.youtube.com/watch?c=sY3XPf912-k

WikiHow. (2013). How to be Polite. Retrieved from www.wikihow.com/Be-Polite

Unknown. (2013). Rachel Jeantel. [Photograph]. Retrieved from http://www.tigerdroppings.com/rant/display.aspx?p=42686299&pg=3